Psystar have either one (or both) of these two things on their side: Some supporters (other companies) or LOTS of money. I would think the first option.
Apple has a history of being very intimidating as far as law goes. They are like black holes - nothing can defeat them. But here’s a little company taking on this black hole - and its doing f**king well.
Psystar alleges that by virtue of Apple’s leveraging of copyrights in the context of Apple’s EULA, spurious litigation via the DMCA, and various other anti- and unfair competitive conduct, there is no viable alternative to the purchase and use of Apple-Labeled Computer Hardware Systems for users who wish to use the Mac OS, for a prospective buyer of the Mac OS, or for a user of an older version of the Mac OS.
I’m not sure if I want Apple to be forced to offer their OS to other hardware vendors - the main reason OS X is so stable is the fact that it is streamlined around it’s own hardware (hey, if you want to see this in action, try building a hackintosh with a retail OS X DVD - you will find things like network cards, sound cards etc wont even be recognized). Also, there is a sense of pride in owning a Mac, the hardware just goes with OS X, and you feel “special,” not like one of the ordinary users of a Windows PC.








